Vox Clamatis in Deserto

Thursday, July 01, 2004

Lefties Aren't Elitists?

Vaughn's Comment:

what a stupid fucking op/ed that is empty and absolutely fails to address anything of substance. . . but good enough to get my blood boiling. . . . -v

NYT Op/Ed Here


My comment:
The article is funny, not serious. Of course some community college students are leftists who don't have ten cents to rub together. To assert, however, that the rich in this country don't have a liberal bend is to ignore solid empirical evidence from surveys (and even lefty books (see Fussel's Class book)).

The wealthy on both coasts tend to be more liberal than the average American if they 1) were Ivy educated; 2) came from a coastal background (CA not KA); 3) are in the arts, media, publishing or education; 4) are anyone who associates with these people; 5) are almost anyone who follows political fads. These tend to be the high-profile leftists in the country.

Righties and lefties have rich backers, period. To argue that the left is a solid working class movement, while the right is a club for the wealthy is a myth that both statistical surveys and a visit to any college campus will readily dispel. Both sides enjoy support from a mix of backgrounds, rich and poor. Why do you think the country votes almost 50-50, Rep and Dem? If we were really talking about a rich versus poor choice, then the vote should be skewed markedly in one direction.

I feel like the country is arguing like children now. The faddish anti-Bush stance of all (no hesitation here) leftists is comical -- as if the emotional defense of most righties. No one is perfect. The presupposition that the President is (or could be) is silly morally and practically. Clinton's excesses demonstrated that point rather well.

To Lefties:
Is Bush really Hitler incarnate? Would you have opposed the Iraq war if Clinton had supported it? His foray into Somalia was a lefty adventure that drew nary a peep out of the no-war-at-all-costs-crowd. Somalia had even less national security significance than Iraq. If you're all for human rights, what do you do to a dictator who ignores you? I'm not being facetious. What do you do? UN?

2.5M people died in Congo while waiting for the UN (which never did anything significant to stop the genocide, even after its extent was revealed). Do you really have more faith in the UN's judgement than in the US's? Isn't your hatred of Bush a veiled contempt of the opinions that most Americans hold (patriotism, anti-UN-go-it-alone-if-necessisary-ism, etc)? Isn't it funny how you still claim to support the average man on the street?

To Righties:
Bush is not god. No one is. Defend him when he is right, otherwise, don't. There's more than enough to criticize on the left without having to legitimize its worst proponents (Moore, again) by hyperventilating.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Spot on, Bourgeois. Once again I appreciate your ability to warn the right of the dangers of blindly defending all things "right" and holding a mirror before the emotionally charged left with all their manufacture indignation. Of course both the right and left can claim a mixed socio-economic constiuency. In fact sometimes all these "blue collar, working class folk" that the two parties kill each other to influence usually have a mix of right and left tendencies. Some of those people, who are not actively following or involved in politics, may not know that their stance on a certain issue deviates from the stance of their declared affiliation. For example. In New Hampshire in 2000, I met very strong, blue-collar union Democrats who were voting for Bush on two issues: (1) Many were NRA members and in rural New Hampshire a rifle had certain sporting benefits and, more importantly, (2) they were employed in the paper products and logging industries. A vote for Gore could have regulated their paper mill into oblivion.
I feel for them the way I feel for the secularist right. The nice thing about not being a political candidate is that we are free to make up our own mind on different issues without worry about pissing off our fund-raising machine.
Thank you for pointing out the ubsurdity of any claim to the keys to working-man's America.
In response to the Ivy Educated comment you made. I was Ivy Educated and from a less than affluent background. Excuse the cliche, but the folks I encountered at H were the definition of limosene liberals. Not that there weren't rich conservatives there also (although conservatives were fewer in number and more discreet politically), but they did not seem to harbor the same feelings of guilt from their status as their liberal collegues. I think many of these kids grow out of their extreme WTO-protesting, Marx-reading, beret-wearing ideologies when they grow-up and get real jobs--whether they choose to be Republican or Democrat.

3:20 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home